From each scheme that came out from each group, I see the potential in combining elements from different scheme.
Here is the list of the things that i like and dislike from each group.
1st group
+ Use of different materials
+ Round sink which are located in the area of the circulation area
+ using table top as a flexible tool for outdoor learning/playing
- there is no big flat plane
2nd group
+ Cutting of the slope hill
+ Infrastructure which encourage the children to interact with
- the space where the slope meets the element art building doesn't seems like a very good space.
3rd Group
+ Area usage
+ Calm corner
+ Digging the soil up and use them to build a lifted ground level
- By creating the lower than the usual ground level, You might have to deal with some problem which come along -> Flooding , Drainage System
4th Group
+ Simple but very interesting infrastructure. Big potential in developing them.
+ the infrastructure itself could be shading device, Play toy, Platform, Roof, Ground And much more
- The proportion of the Tree-like Infrastructure doesn't look like it is strong enough for children to stand on.
- Using Iron means more welding - more welding means more man power with skill is needed.
Some idea from each group could be combine to create a space that we wanted. for example:
* We could put the tree-like infrastructure in the calm corner that the 2nd group proposed.
One thing that I'm a little bit concern is about the Concrete block.. How are we gona deal with it ?
No comments:
Post a Comment